Next month is the first anniversary of Slutwalk. A feminist protest march against free-speech, self-responsibility and healthy fraternization between the sexes. It is going to be interesting to see how many sluts come along to this year’s planned slutwalks and how many of them will, like myself, having reflected on the matter for a few months have come to the conclusion that supporting the original Slutwalk was one of the stupidest things I’ve ever done.
Before I get onto why slut shaming is a worthwhile and honourable pursuit in our society, I just want to quickly rehash why Slutwalk was anti-free speech, pro-irresponsibility and pro-sexual perversion. Slutwalk started when a group of feminists got their knickers in a twist because a Toronto police constable said that “women should avoid dressing like sluts,” to reduce the risk of being raped or sexually assaulted. Note that this police constable didn’t do anything, he only said something. Also, he was a constable, not even a senior policeman. He merely expressed his own opinion, which to me contains some sage advice: don’t bait the wolf if you want to be safe outside the village at night. (Note: I have to say this, because some people seem to think I’m saying, “all men are wolves who would rape if they had a piece a jail-bait dangling in from of them,” I was using an analogy of irresponsibly behaviour, not making a suggestion that all men are sexual predators. Some men do rape, the vast majority of men don’t rape and will actively intervene to prevent rape.)
The worldwide protests that erupted following this statement illustrate how insane the typical mainstream feminist is. Street protests of this scale usually erupt because of something someone has done: start a war that kills many thousands of people, introduced a law that forces a significant proportion of the population to live in squalor or mismanaged billions of dollars of other people’s money. You know, protests over something that someone has actually done, as opposed to merely something that someone has said. To protest over someone else’s opinion, is to attempt to silence that person which is anti-free speech and therefore anti-democratic. Also, when people protest a real issue, like the Vietnam war, civil rights or the protection of banks through public theft, the police usually jump in and start beating people senseless. Ironically, the more justified their cause, the greater the police violence usually is: they actually shot people dead on university campuses for protesting the invasion of Cambodia. When slutwalkers start getting beaten senseless by police or state-hired thugs, then I might start taking them seriously. But the fact that no government took a slut walk down tells me that governments will endorse anyone who is anti-free speech. I wonder if the state would beat up anti-“the 99%” street protestors? Personally, I’m going to stand by Constable Michael Sanguinetti because he has the right to express his opinion even if the whole world disagrees with it, and frankly, I do agree with him, it was good advice.
The second point, is that slutwalkers are trying to get women exempt for being self-responsible. They are effectively saying that men, not women, are responsible for protecting and keeping women safe which is chauvinist to the stratosphere. Imagine we reversed the sexes. Some men after walking home from a soccer match at which their team won and they notice a group of miserable looking drunk supporters of the losing team in a bar. If the men from the winning team walked up to the losing team drowning their sorrows and started ridiculing them and waving their team’s victory in their face how sympathetic are you going to be if those men get the shit firmly kicked out of them? I’m not saying that violence is acceptable, I’m saying, provoking a fight then complaining about the consequences is stupid and an irresponsible thing to do. If a woman dresses like a slut, teases drunk and sexually frustrated men in a shady bar late at night, it doesn’t make the rape/sexual assault ok, but it does tell me that that woman is a stupid irresponsible twit, and honestly, I have has much sympathy for her as those soccer fans: nil.
Why? Because it isn’t logical to respect a person who won’t respect themselves. Self-responsibility is self-respect.
If women want to be taken seriously in society, as equals to men, then they need to shoulder the same level of responsibility for their decisions as men do. Slutwalks are nothing but organised public whinging sessions about how hard life is for women. Life is hard for men too, but men can’t complain about it because men are “privileged,” supposedly. The men have to grow a thicker skin and for the sake of freedom of speech, the slut walkers need to grow a thicker skin too and stop whingeing about a perfectly honourable activity: shaming sluts.
Slutwalk is pro-sexual irresponsibility. To be clear, I’m a biologist and I’m fascinated with culture and sexual history. I’m certain that being a polyamorous licentious troupe of sex crazed apes is our natural sexual behaviour as a species. Nearly every nomadic human tribe studied loves a good public orgy with a terrifyingly low age of consent. Being slutty is a human instinct. However, we ain’t nomads anymore. We now live in massively over populated cities with limited personal geographical mobility and more sexually transmitted diseases than ever before. In many ways our lives are more dangerous now than they were ten thousand years ago and the sexual free-for-all days of our past are going to get us killed either by sexually transmitted diseases, failure to adequately provide for and nurture our children or our current inability to balance the state budget because the state is being forced to be a husband to “empowered women” who no longer take marriage seriously and choose to be dependent on the state instead of a husband. Because it is more “empowering” to depend on a massive faceless state machine for protection and money than to depend on a man you can talk with, if and when, you want to, excuse my sarcasm.
Sleeping around with whomever you like, whenever you like, is fine, so long as you don’t consider the consequences. The consequences of being a slut are: contracting an STD, infecting other people with your STDs, getting pregnant, getting pregnant to a stranger, getting pregnant to someone other than your husband and getting pregnant without a husband or without adequate family/community support to raise a child. Those are some pretty damn serious consequences for being a slut, and they don’t just affect men.
Reasons why men and women want to publicly shame sluts:
1. A warning to others: By publicly calling out a person as a slut one is doing a public service. One is spreading useful information about a person. Men informing other men of a woman’s sluttiness are telling them she might carry STDs, she’s quite likely to commit paternity fraud and she’s a risk of “accidental” pregnancy. They aren’t necessarily saying, “don’t go out with her,” they may merely be saying, “be careful, she’s dangerous, she might do more harm than just hurt your feelings.” Women might also publicly call out a slut because they care about reducing the spread of STDs and the cost to society, both financially and socially, of single mothers. I’m sure there are plenty of responsible working women out there who feel frustrated they’re paying higher taxes so the government can mitigate the consequences other women’s irresponsible sexual behaviour.
2. An incentive to change ones behaviour: Public shaming, is used with children all the time as an incentive to stop harmful behaviour like starting fights; breaking other children’s toys, crying wolf, etcetera. Interestingly, it still works with adults, perhaps even more effectively than with children, yet it is not politically correct to publicly shame an adult because, who knows, it might hurt someone’s political career to expose them as a lying scumbag or a paedophile (never mind the victims of lying politicians or paedophiles). Publicly shaming sluts teaches them to be more sexually responsible which is a good thing. If you think being sexually irresponsible isn’t bad, you really need to tell someone with HIV, herpes, crippling child support payments, or a single mother living in a slum with several children from several different men.
3. A deterrent to future sluts: When a slut is publicly humiliated, the future slut-wannabes watching this humiliation get it explained to them, in no uncertain terms, that being a slut is not a good thing to be. It will make them think about it more, they’ll think about the consequences of their actions and, lo and behold, they might practice responsible sex.
4. As revenge or to eliminate a sexual rival: Sometimes people do slut shame for the wrong reasons. Either they shame someone who isn’t a slut, which is being dishonest or in old fashioned speak “dishonourable” (back in the day when people had a sense of honour), or they call someone out as a slut purely to eliminate them as a sexual rival. While the latter is selfish, it’s doing the right thing for the wrong reasons so it doesn’t bother me that much. However, the former, calling slut when a person isn’t a slut is a serious offence.
Of these four reasons why someone would call someone else out as a slut, three of them are wholesome and valid reasons, only the last one isn’t. Feminism wants us to throw away a noble and honourable social practice of slut shaming because it might be misused. Well, everything can be misused, should we ban plastic bags because they can kill? Should we ban bath tubs because people can drown in them? Should we ban language because it allows people to lie? Get a fucking reality check: a slut is not a good thing to be and if you are a slut, you should feel ashamed for yourself.
However, this attitude of it’s ok to be a slut was displayed again recently by the feminist lobby when they censured Rush Limbaugh, or rather by using political intimidation, denied him his right to freedom of speech. Rush Limbaugh was right, they are selfish sluts, when the feminist lobby say they want the government to pay for their contraception (which isn’t a necessity) they are saying that they expect the tax payers (mostly men) to protect them against their irresponsibility for no gratitude. Even as the United States is being crushed by toxic levels of debt, the feminist lobby still care more about their own personal interests over the interests of their community: that is to say, “fuck society, I only care about me.” That’s the narcissistic corrupt mentality that John F. Kennedy was talking about when he said, “Ask not, what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”
A slut only thinks about their immediate pleasure, they don’t think about the consequences of their actions, if they did, they wouldn’t act so irresponsibly.
If there was not a risk of STDs (found in closed hygienic tribal communities), no risk of pregnancy or in the case of pregnancy that the child was assured a strong community to support and raise the child (found in a tight-knit tribal community) and if paternity fraud wasn’t a concern of the father (found in a tight-knit tribal community) then it is easy to understand why being a slut was par for the course in prehistoric nomadic times for the human species. But we don’t live in nomadic times anymore. It’s a dangerous, complicated and ruthless world, and the best defence is to be responsible and to act responsibly, and that’s going to have to mean using a lot more self-control than is comfortable most of the time. But you either accept that, or you accept that sooner or later your irresponsible decisions will eventually kill you, if not countless others collaterally, on the way to your eventual demise. I hope you don’t feel shy calling out a slut the next time you see one, if there’s an irresponsible nitwit in our community, letting everyone else know is the most responsible thing you can do.
Further Reading
Please check out the following websites for more information:
Want to read more about my views on feminism and gender issues?
Here are some of my most recent ones:
May 13, 2014excuse my foul language. You are the biggest dimwith, asshole of a shit i have ever heard of in my entire life. you are EXACTLY the kind of person encouraging RAPE CULTURE!! did you not think for one moment that perhaps the RAPIST should have some fucking self control?!?!!? A women, a man, anyone, can wear whatever the hell they want and that does not give you any right whatsoever to rape them! you are really just a deluded dickhead who thinks they know everything when infact your brain is completely empty. so please FUCK OF AND SHOVE YOUR UNWANTED OPINIONS BACK UP YOUR ASS AND COME BACK WHEN YOU CAN THINK STRAIGHT!!
January 4, 2015says the future rapist
January 31, 2015Thanks for this comment, I feel a little better about the world knowing men like you exist…
June 15, 2014I completely agree with you except for the part of not bating the wolf, while I understand your viewpoint a rapist is going to rape no matter what said victim is wearing. Unfortunatley morals are dead in our society and these anti slut shaming people are trying to make it okay to go around fucking everybody like a bunch of rats which will bring their own doom upon them with stds/stis, their children not knowing who daddy is and all sorts of other horrible reciprocations. People should know when someone is a fucking every guy on the damn block for their own protection, and the people fucking a shit ton of people without thinking of the consequences should feel ashamed of themselves. And to the ones wanting free contraception; Nothing is free, if you want free contraception that means that taxes will be raised as we already barely scrape by and even if it werent that most people these days are just scraping by I will not condone your irresponsible, disgusting and horrible behaviors. Im in favor of feminism, im completely egalitarian for everyone but this anti slutshaming shit is just for girls and guys who want to be whores with no consequences from society all covering it up under calling slutshamers misogynists and sexust which is not the case, exspecially for me.
July 11, 2014Yeah.
You don’t actually know what slut-shaming is, you just thought ‘well, sluts should be ashaimed!’ and wrote an article, didn’t you?
I’m sorry you’re so stupid.
January 4, 2015big talk coming from the “HENTAI” christ.
August 2, 2014Wow. You are one of the people that makes this world a bad place. And btw, an innocent virgin girl wearing modest jeans and a teeshirt can be raped too.
January 4, 2015as easy as the hooker on the street corner? cuz my money’s on the hooker.
January 31, 2015You know nothing of rape if you think that. Hookers are not even close to being the majority of rape victims, you should check out the statistics in this country. A women is more likely to be assualted by someone she already knows and that often includes relatives. And that has often included children being assualted. Want to make a guess at how many “hookers” where assualted sexually before they were ever introduced to that line of work? Watch some documentaries. I am a women, i was assaulted as a child, and i know plenty of others. Rape happens when there is a man willing to rape and a prime opportunity to do so.
August 14, 2014This is exactly what Islam wants from a woman. So she is be protect her self from even bad look at her any part of her body.
January 6, 2015No what Islam wants is for men and women to dress and act modestly,and responsibly.
October 23, 2014I just want to call out your tenuous understanding of free speech and how it actually functions in a democratic society. Fuck, man, you even linked the freedom of speech Wikipedia article in your diatribe. Did you not read that shit?
November 20, 2014you are a piece of shit. Rape is not okay, it will never be okay. No one asks to be raped. If you can’t understand that, you are the reason why this world is a piece of fucking shit.
April 15, 2015That was exactly the kind language I would expect from a …..I am sure you are diesel butch with ample facial hair. You might be actually rape-proof. Now, there is something going for you!
January 6, 2015I think all of the emotional and swearing decentors of this article prove her point. No thoughtful responses or intelligent responses. Just “I feel this way” and “your bad because people against my postion are. This person cares about society and people being hurt . What do you care about? Can you stop spitting vitriol and think? How do societies get built and survive. If religion is the tool that helped us get this far why are we trashing it? I think it’s great we live in a society where ideals can be expressed freely. It’s ashame that most of these”new” ideas have little concern for personal and civic responsibility. I grew up in a single parent home(parents not married), ended up with least crazy of 2 parents. She was a drug addict(her personal freedom right?). Luckily for me she got sober and started putting me 1st before it was completely too late. So to everyone who is theorizing about personal freedoms vs personal responsibility, remember. Their are aloof people who have survived this and know the real cost. Maybe 55 years of “do what thou whilt”, is the reason being religious is on the upswing. Any condescending comments on my comment can be file here. #fuckyoualready
January 31, 2015What about men who dont practice responsible sex? I’ve known many who dont/didn’t in the past, including my own boyfriend. Is society to start calling out these “man whores” in the hopes that they too, will start
making responsible decisions for the benefit of all? After all, men also spread std’s, and women dont get pregnant on their own. Is it good for society that many young men will gladly have sex, impregnate a girl and then leave her to deal with the financial and emotional burden? Oh, let me guess, its not as bad when men are sexually irrisponsible right? Doesnt hurt society, especially if in your definition of society, only men count. Dont bother to consider the hurt and rammifications women have dealt with due to men’s lack of sexual responsibility, b/c again, women don’t count. Men, unlike women, are human beings capable learning on their own, they can be “trusted” to do the right things eventually, so nothing ever need be said about their sexual decisions. And if they never do so what? That girl over there is wearing a short skirt, thats why society is so fucked and gas prices are high and then theres the stds and the starvation and the orphons and such! And dont give the “well men shouldnt do those things either but…” because there is always a “but”. If it is of equal importance how men and women conduct themselves, then stop focusing on women only! Why not address “people” as a whole with these concerns?
February 22, 2015The difference is sexually irresponsible men don’t bear the responsibility of getting pregnant and dealing with childbirth.
March 2, 2015First of all, I don’t know which culture some of you are from, but most people find slutty men slimy and disgusting. Bill Clinton lost his job for having a consensual affair. And while I in no way am a fan, Robin Thicke’s career was hurt for having some sort of mild affair too.
I agree and disagree with this article.
People will keep on being slutty and spreading things, it’s necessary to control decease transmission. Providing birth control pills and contraceptives is the ideal way to prevent std transmission and unwanted pregnancies before it becomes an epidemic like in some other countries.
If slutwalk was simply: “no means no, no matter what I am wearing” then I would agree with it. I entirely disagree that it’s okay to sleep around and no one has to know if someone goes through 20 partners a year. It seems like slutwalk sympatizers simply want to close down all discussion on the issue while instead of promoting honesty by opening debate.They’re basically telling us all to:”Spread it, and keep our mouths shut”.
March 2, 2015Let me turn this around a bit. I would argue that slutty women actually prevent rape by giving a sexual outlet to men who are not prepared for marriage. Let the sluts exist and deal with their consequences while the good girls exist for marriage to responsible men.
March 4, 2015you filthy bald piece of shit. I’m ashamed to be from the same country as you, you fucking bogan cunt. You obviously have been dumped by that many women, or been rejected that many times at the strippers that you have this blind hatred towards women. Mate, you’re a fucking joke. No wonder no woman will fuck you, with a balding head like yours. I’ll put money on the bet that the only sex you manage to get is via your credit card.
March 18, 2015I have to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this website.
I really hope to check out the same high-grade blog posts

by you later on as well. In truth, your creative
writing abilities has encouraged me to get my own, personal site now
March 21, 2015Hello to all, the contents present at this web site are
genuinely amazing for people experience, well, keep up the nice work fellows.
April 6, 2015I just watched the beginning of your Dr Phil episode and I have already noticed various flaws in the 30 seconds worth of shit that has come out of your mouth.
I believe you’re a fucking idiot.. A slut isn’t a woman who dresses in a way that shows her breasts (which by the way are perfectly natural, were created with intention of providing for a baby and were once accepted to be shown completely in everyday life), a slut is a name given to a “woman” who has multiple sexual partners at once.
Firstly, Jason your use of the term “slut” is incorrect and you are potentially calling virgins sluts which is a complete contradiction of the term and secondly, the fact that you’re using a term that should be used to describe both genders but only targets one shows just how much of an asshole sexist pig you are.
I’m about to watch the remainder of your interview with Dr Phil and am anticipating yet another half-assed attempt at the justification of rape and how women are to blame. I’m sure I’ll have no trouble pointing out further flaws in your pathetic argument which I’ll be sure to notify you of.
Oh and Jason, a woman should be able to walk down the street naked and not be raped. Not only was this the way of life before society fucked everything up, but it is also nature’s intended practice. THE WOMEN YOU DESCRIBE ARE NOT THE REASON FOR RAPE, RAPIST ARE THE REASON FOR RAPE.
April 6, 2015Okay just skim read your terrible article and found a few flaws you should consider:
“If women want to be taken seriously in society, as equals to men, then they need to shoulder the same level of responsibility for their decisions as men do.”
You’re saying that the female gender, as a whole, do not take responsibility for their own actions and therefore are not entitled to have equality with men.
You go onto say that the male gender, as a whole, who “take responsibility for their decisions” are and will remain superior to females. In saying this you are stating that men who rape women and children should be treated better then women because “they shoulder responsibility for their actions”, which believe me a lot of them don’t.
Ok second point, “Sleeping around with whomever you like, whenever you like, is fine, so long as you don’t consider the consequences. The consequences of being a slut are”
Inconsistency with your original use of the term slut; you originally said a slut is a woman who dresses provocatively and are now saying a slut is a woman who has sex with multiple people. Meaning all the women, whom you called a slut for merely how they dressed, are not included in your arguments about “the dangers of being a slut (sleeping around)”. Again remember calling “provocatively” dressed sluts includes virgins, non sexually active women and women who are loyal to one partner, you’re whole argument completely turns to shit with this.
You also said the slut walk was completely based around one police officer saying one thing about women’s dress. This is fucking ridiculous considering, A. The police officer wouldn’t have felt the need to bring this to attention had certain men not felt entitled to women dressed a certain way. This point shows that the police officer’s statement just lit up the injustice that women deal with daily and thus began a movement of people opposed to women being sexually harassed, raped and/or murdered on account of their clothing.
Another point you made was that describing your fascination with sexual history. If you were good at your job of a “biologist” and actually had the ability to be a feminist (which you obviously have misinterpreted as something that it’s not, note: feminism is just wanting equality between genders not entitlement to women), you would know that way, way back things were as they should be, natural. Clothing was scarce with both genders and after walking around naked, we began to introduce clothing that typically only covered both the lower female and male genitalia. This left the chest of both males and females exposed and this was normality. As you should also know, the female’s breasts only have one purpose and that is to provide nutrition for her young, if you were smart enough to consider this you’d understand that women and men’s chests are no different and one has just become sexualised over time but in reality they both deserve the same freedom to be exposed as there is nothing sexual or “slutty” about them. It’s pure science. HOW THE FUCK YOU CALL YOURSELF A BIOLOGIST IS BEYOND ME. You said “Being slutty is a human instinct” so you’re saying “having multiple sexual partners is a human instinct”? Again your misuse of the term slut is laughable considering I’m an 11th grader and can figure that one out. What I’m assuming you meant was ‘Being sexually provocative is a human instinct’ which would make more sense but is still an incorrect statement. Yes, humans do want to find a mate but no they do not do this by exposing their breasts as you suggest. How could this possibly be the case when back when evolution occurred (the time when our human instincts were developed) we were nude and even further down the track women’s breasts were exposed constantly. It would be impossible to use something as accepted as an arm (in todays society) to be “slutty” as you suggest (again, not the word).
These are just some points I noticed, like I said I only gave your article a skim read because I can see how clearly ignorant and uneducated you are. My advice, research a little next time… You wouldn’t want to be discredited by a 16 year old high school student now would you?