This is despite the fact that, very often, they are not ideas formed in the offended minds of minorities at all, but by members of the majority who want to destroy their own culture, for whatever reason. They use minorities to camouflage their true intentions.
There is a very clear line between speaking your mind on a topic you find controversial, and making an issue out of nothing, merely for the attention to further some ulterior agenda. This is the major problem I have with “political correctness terrorists” and I outwardly declare war on them via Intentious. Make no mistake, I will be attacking every example of “political correctness gone too far” that I possibly can, on this news site. Why? Because with every PC case that is given media and court time, we unravel a little more of our society’s security, a little more of our society’s common sense, edging ever closer to a nation with so little freedom of expression left, lest we offend or “harm” anyone at all, that we will inevitably open ourselves right up to a takeover by said minority groups.
The latest example stars once again, that all-time world champion of political correctness, the BBC. Apparently, it has jumped on the recent bandwagon that the terms AD and BC (Anno Domini, or the Year of Our Lord, and Before Christ) must be replaced by the terms Common Era and Before Common Era. You will recall, that Intentious covered this farce earlier in the year: when the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority decided it would be in everybody’s best interest to adopt it in public, non-religious schools, a true show of equal rights for non Christians.
The Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), the independent authority responsible for the development of national curriculum, said BCE and CE were to be introduced because this was an increasingly common standard for the representation of dates. A spokesman for ACARA explained that the little known term BP (Before Present) will be used when dealing with “very ancient history and archaeology, and allows for the teaching of more sophisticated understandings of representations of time.” A spokesman for Adrian Piccoli (Education Minister) said the minister was not concerned about the changes as the terms BCE and CE were now commonly used.
“Australia is what it is today because of the foundations of our nation in the Judeo-Christian heritage that we inherited from Western civilisation. Kowtowing to political correctness by the embarrassing removal of AD and BC in our national curriculum is of a piece with the fundamental flaw of trying to deny who we are as a people.”
Source: From BC to PC – Erasing Jesus from the Historical Timeline | Intentious
See, on first read, the ACARA’s cleverly worded stance seems totally good natured and reasonable at first: what a responsible authority! They’re acting in the best interests of 21st century learning, giving students a more meaningful and accurate date system… in the word “common era”?
Excuse me, but how is “common era” any more accurate or meaningful to explain the reason the whole world numbers this the year “2011″? Regardless of whether you believe in Christ or not, what explanation is there for when “common era” begins and why humans decided to start counting two thousand and eleven years ago? Did we all just wake up one day and switch to “the common era”?
The irony is not lost on me:
Thankfully though, this is one battle the UK (and common sense) has won… for now:
Admittedly, the finer details of this particular example are a little removed from my larger argument against Political Correctness war in general, so allow me to steer it onwards:Australia, the United Kingdom and the US are not “on their way” to becoming PC nanny states, they already are. You can’t so much as propose a children’s movie with 1980′s standards of scary (and by scary, I’m talking “Dot And The Kangaroo”, “The Dark Crystal” or “The Neverending Story” level of scary) before super-precious parents who don’t even go to the cinema, complain that we will irreversibly destroy the minds of their innocent children if they see something that might be slightly terrifying in the context of a thrilling family adventure.
Somebody show these children a program with a full range of emotional experiences, lest they turn into the PC zombies their terribly sheltered parents have become.
Call Me A Racist
Like him or loathe him, one of the last bastions of truly open political blogging in this world is Australia’s (in)famous newspaper columnist and blogger, Andrew Bolt. He speaks a lot of nonsense and offends many, but more often than not, he is one of the good guys: he reels us citizens back in and reminds us to at least consider different sides of common sense and question the political correctness machine around us.
This is why we should all worry greatly about the latest bizarre ruling from the federal court, which found Bolt in breach of the Racial Discrimination Act.
Andrew Bolt was today found guilty in the Federal Court of breaches of the Racial Discrimination Act. Justice Mordy Bromberg in his ruling, found two articles written by Bolt in 2009—claiming that self-proclaimed aborigines of caucasian descent and appearance were “political aborigines”, who used their legal “indigenous” status to intrigue themselves into lucrative positions, open only to indigenous Australians, and further their (predominantly activist) careers—left it …reasonably likely that fair-skinned Aboriginal people (or some of them) were offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated.
What this ruling means, is that you can be sued for vilification if – simply – the victim feels that they were greatly offended: an impossible legal criterion, one which is open to any imaginable distortion of meaning, and one which opens the way to the tyranny of the hypersensitive.
The Macpherson Report deems a “racist” incident as “any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person”, a definition that has done immeasurable damage to social cohesion in Britain, further encouraging a poisonous culture of victimhood, grievance and entitlement, as well as serving to increase the racial tension it was supposed to diminish. And now the Australians are following their idiotic example.
Don’t Call Me Fat
Last week, I walked past a magazine stand which boldly advertised the title “Don’t Call Me Fat!” with an obviously obese celebrity claiming offence at the F-word being used to describe her being medically, by definition, fat.
Although being fat is a black and white fact, a medical, measurable threshold, this is not good enough for the easily offended who are gaining more and more media attention every time this PC argument comes up, with increasing pressure on society to drop the definition within the media, advertising and entertainment world.
The fact that the majority of US and Australian citizens are overweight is often used to “prove” a majority feel the word “fat” is a derogatory, hurtful and inaccurate label, that it must go.
However, I believe that a word does not deserve to be abolished, removed from media or re-defined simply to suit the egos of a nation of fatties. The numbers used to represent sizes on dresses are already being deliberately dropped in some stores in order to proliferate this politically correct state of denial the nation is living in: that fat is the new skinny, that obese is the new plus size. Don’t you dare label it any other way lest you get labelled a bigot, sexist, chauvinist yourself.
Don’t Call It Christmas
We are bullied out of being allowed to even claim our traditional holidays, too. At least Europeans still get to play carols on their radio stations, still have angels atop their Christmas trees on television and still sell cards with the nativity and references to Christmas predominantly in the shops. In Australia, due to political correctness, the Christmas season has become some sort of Coles and Woolworths joint venture with Cadburys, devoid of any religious relic in their stores lest it offend and turn away non-Christian shoppers. The once religious nativity scenes famously constructed in department store windows are all but abolished, replaced instead with thinly veiled advertisements to sell meaningless kid’s books or promote some new movie without an ounce of Christian values because non-Christian city walkers might get offended that Christians should dare to continue to have the freedom to celebrate in public.
Well it god damn offends me. So you non-Christians want to take part in Christmas too but not religiously, only commercially? Well I say too fucking bad! Allow Christian owners of businesses to put up what the god damn like and get over it. Do you insult Asian restaurants for displaying a laughing buddah in the window every day of the year? Then why the fuck do you have a problem with Christmas?
All of this PC nonsense offends me greatly. Where are the lawyers and unions for those like me, who find this political correctness foolishness, offensive?
Had I the choice, I would boycott the companies who are perpetrators of political correctness for boycotting my values in common fucking sense and freedom of expression. However, I don’t get that choice. I am the prisoner of society, as famous Australian punk band The Living End once put it. You are a politically correct prisoner and if society commands you not to label and not celebrate what they tell you, then you don’t get the right to be offended!
Wake the fuck up and stand up for yourselves, people. I truly cannot be the only person who feels this way, just take a look at the related articles below. Why don’t more of you speak up? There’s offense and vilification, sure, but there must continue to be a higher degree of common sense, or at the very least, “hardening the fuck up” and not getting offended at every little thing you disagree with.
Apathy in the face of political correctness is allowing the Western world to be stamped out, bit by bit, replaced by hypersensitives: a nation become more and more fragile, and frankly, a more dangerous place to simply be who you are, openly. Soon, you will be able to be sued for simply writing a post like this one right here.
You are all becoming too scared, too embarrassed and too ashamed to stand up for yourselves in this political correctness war. Join me and do something about it.
- From BC to PC: Erasing Jesus from the historical timeline (intentious.com)
- Schools dare to insert God into national anthem (intentious.com)
- Letter: Politically correct corrupting language (knoxnews.com)
- “If Not for PC, Barack Would No Longer be in Office” ~ Crucify Political Correctness on the Altar of Freedom of Speech (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- If you really want to hurt someone, call them a Gervais | Catherine Bennett (guardian.co.uk)
- Reality check: has the BBC banned the use of BC/AD? (guardian.co.uk)
- PC Insanity (lewrockwell.com)
- I’m With the BBC on the BCE/CE v. BC/AD Debate (zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com)
- When did respect turn into political correctness? | Giles Fraser (guardian.co.uk)